Skip to main content

Emotional Intelligence: Acknowledging the Irrational/Emotional Side of our Brain

“Why do I become so irrational during discussions?”

“Why do I get so anxious over things so simple?”

“Seriously! What was I even thinking?”

 

Have you often noticed yourself asking these questions? If yes, then you have come to the right place. Today we will talk about why we behave irrationally under emotions. Before understanding why and how this happens, let’s delve a little into how our brain works.

 

The Brain:



We will not go into the intricacies of our brain. The only parts of the brain that concerns us are the Frontal lobe and the limbic part of the brain. The Frontal lobe is responsible for the rational/logical decisions that we take while the limbic part of the brain is responsible for our behavioral and emotional responses. The limbic part is more primitive while the frontal lobe is a newly formed part of the brain. The limbic part is responsible for emotional memories. It controls how you process strong emotions like fear and pleasure. During various experiments, it was observed that in the state of relaxed and logical interpretation, the blood supply to the frontal lobe was more prominent, the vice versa was true in the case of emotional stimulus.

Dr. Steve Peter, in his book titled “The Chimp Paradox,” compared the limbic part of the brain to a Chimp and the frontal lobe to a Human. He also stated that “Chimp (the emotional part) doesn’t work with facts but works with what he believes is the truth or what it thinks might be the truth” and we as humans are not responsible for the nature of our chimp but we are responsible for its management.



All the irrational thinking, paranoia, anxiety, and emotive judgments are the work of our limbic part of the brain.

Our motive as an emotionally intelligent person should be to make our logical part (the frontal part) more dominant so that we are not irrational/emotional while making our decisions.

 

Acknowledging the Irrational side:

The first step to solving a problem is to acknowledge that we have one. You are not the only person who has an emotional brain functioning, in fact, the emotional side is much more dominant than the rational side of our brain. It is our duty as a human to acknowledge that our emotional responses are neither bad nor good. They are as Dr. Steve Peter puts it “decisions made by a chimp”, they could be good, or they could be bad. We as emotionally intelligent people should weigh in on those decisions by thinking them over before acting on the impulse.

 

Tense and relaxed:

It was found that in the state of tension/stress, the blood flow to the limbic part of the brain increases since during the early human days a tensed state meant danger which would, in turn, trigger the “Fight and Flight response”. We should understand and try to convince ourselves that a presentation/meeting/discussion is not going to kill us and does not require this. You might or might not have noticed that your breaths become rapid and short when you are tensed. Noticing your breath alone and explicitly breathing deeply could help you become more relaxed and rational when you are starting to get tensed up.

 

Ten minutes to emotional intelligence:

Every day sit for 10 minutes and try to remember the moments in the past 24 hours where you think your “Emotional part” was more dominant and try to think how you could have handled it better if you were logical/rational. This simple sort of meditative/relaxing exercise could go a long way in helping you with your aim of emotional intelligence.

 

Conclusion:

You are not the first/only person who suffers because of your emotional side. As mentioned above the emotional side is like a chimp (stronger than a human) but it could be tamed with the right mindset. Hence the first step is to acknowledge and not feel guilty about having an “irrational side working on emotive judgments” and trying to work with it. These qualities are not exhaustive for you to become emotionally intelligent but are a strong foundation over which your emotional intelligence could be built. We will talk more about these other qualities (like good communication, your goals, and self-fulfillment) in my upcoming blogs. So, consider subscribing and stay safe till we meet the next time.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The "Association and Dissociation" Technique and "The fear of Public Speaking"

The "Association and Dissociation" Technique Benefits Neutralize Experiences of low to medium intensity. amplify the positive feeling or some positive experience that you had in the past. This exercise is not recommended for traumatic experiences Note : To understand this technique, we will perform an exercise. You don’t need any equipment to perform this exercise but it is expected of you to sit in a quiet place with minimal disturbances so that you can focus on this exercise. Running Exercise Sit straight with your spine and shoulders erect. Close your eyes. Now imagine that you are seeing yourself running from a distance. i.e you are observing yourself running from far away. Well, you can imagine seeing yourself running on the road while you are sitting on a park bench. How do you feel about it? Most of you will probably feel nothing. Now merge yourself with the object i.e imagine yourself running and observing through the eyes of a runner. You would

How to give Feedback when stakes are high?

I don’t want to hurt him/her. But he/she needs to know this because this is affecting his/her relationship with me and other people around us. Have you ever been in a similar situation and wondered if there is a warmer way to do it without hurting the person. Yes, there is a way to give honest feedback without hurting the person in front. To learn this way, we will first understand the “Gain-Loss principle” given by Elliot Aaronson and Darwyn Linder based on the results of an experiment conducted by them in the year 1965 first. The experiment: In this experiment, people who volunteered as the subject were interviewed by a confederate(Someone who assists in a plot) of the experiment. Then in this experiment, the subject would overhear the conversation between the confederate and the researcher where the confederate would describe the subject to the researcher. The Description of the subject was always one of the four mentioned below: 1.              Positive: The description wa

Are you being manipulated to believe in Astrology?

To understand this, let us first talk about the “ Confirmation bias ” and the “ Egocentric bias ”.   Confirmations Bias: The tendency of people to seek confirmation of their current beliefs and impressions.                People generally tend to ignore the things that are against their current beliefs and tend to stick with the ones that support their belief system. That is people try to absorb only the information which fits in with the information they currently have. This could be seen with the fact that people generally marry their spouses who have a similar mindset and depart from the relationships where their beliefs are being questioned and challenged.   Egocentric bias: People relate more to situations and stigmas that apply to them than the ones that aren’t.                     People tend to keep themselves at the centre of the universe. That is people remember new information better when they can apply it to themselves and tend to ignore/forget if they t

How to motivate yourself?

Have you ever set a goal where you were really motivated at the start and eventually lost the interest/motivation to pursue it? This habit is not only hindering your goals but also decreasing your confidence in yourself. When the frequency of non-fulfillment of goals is increased, your sense of self-worth suffers, and you start thinking that maybe you’re not made for that work or maybe you are just an average human who is not made for non-average things. Today we will talk about a better way to commit to your goals. If this doesn’t work for you, it doesn’t mean that you are not good enough perhaps you need to understand that same jabs and hooks don’t work for all boxers and you should rather try to find the ones that suit your style. To understand this technique, we must first understand the experiment which proved its effectiveness. The Experiment: This Experiment was conducted by two renowned psychologists Morton Deutsch and Harold Gerald in 1995 . In this experiment, the parti

How to not worry/panic/procrastinate?

In often every conversation, you will hear people saying things like “Don’t worry about it” or “Don’t Panic”. Consider this, if I ask you to not imagine a “A cute Panda”, what would immediately happen? You will imagine it right away. Despite listening to what I said, you will still imagine the Panda. The same thing happens when we say   “I won’t procrastinate today”, our brains do not know how to process the negative language. Instead of not doing what we are asked not to do, we do it. Have you ever been in a moment where you said “I won’t do this, this is destroying my health/wealth/reputation” and you end up doing it right away? Take the case where you say “I won’t panic” and you end up panicking a lot. What happens is you end up panicking about what would happen if you would panic, so you end up panicking about “Not Panicking”. This is what Mark Manson in his book “The Subtle Art of not giving a F*ck” referred to as the “Feedback loop from Hell” where you worry about the possi

Questions vs Statements: How to stop being the interrogator in a conversation?

Have you ever had the feeling of being an interrogator/interviewer rather than being a part of the conversation? Asking questions is unavoidable to get the conversation rolling but once it is rolling, you should make them very few and as distant as possible. But today I will teach you a powerful technique of conversation which will not only make your conversation more interesting but also more friendly, unlike the ones where you sound like an interviewer. The Approach: When you see friends talking, you know they talk in statements than questions. The main idea here is to talk in statements rather than questions. Questions are a way of asking people information, but statements are a way of giving information, having deep conversations and building relations. The technique that I will talk about today is called the “ Cold Reading Technique ” where you make a statement about the person pretending that you intuitively know it without actually knowing it. What we do here is that rather